Open Access680. In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU and Non-ICU Wards Collected in Latin America and Globally as Part of the ATLAS Surveillance Program 2016–2017
Author(s) -
Sibylle Lob,
Krystyna M. Kazmierczak,
Gregory G. Stone,
Daniel F. Sahm
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.748
Subject(s) - ceftazidime/avibactam , broth microdilution , pseudomonas aeruginosa , colistin , avibactam , medicine , ceftazidime , microbiology and biotechnology , amikacin , meropenem , antimicrobial , biology , minimum inhibitory concentration , antibiotic resistance , antibiotics , bacteria , genetics
Background Ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C and some class D β-lactamases but not class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Antimicrobial resistance due to these β-lactamases and other mechanisms is increasing and is especially high in ICUs. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in ICU and non-ICU wards. Methods Nonduplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2016–2017 in Asia/Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and Middle East/Africa. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2019 breakpoints. PCR and sequencing were used to determine the β-lactamase genes present in all isolates with meropenem (MEM) MIC >2 µg/mL. Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators is shown in the table. Susceptibility rates among global P. aeruginosa were generally lower for isolates from patients in ICU than non-ICU wards, but this difference was small for CAZ-AVI (89% and 92% susceptible, respectively) and for amikacin and colistin. Among MEM-nonsusceptible (NS) isolates, CAZ-AVI was active against 72% and 70% of isolates, respectively, of which 18.4% and 18.7% were MBL-positive. CAZ AVI inhibited >83% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates globally. In Latin America (LA), CAZ-AVI was active against 87% of isolates from both ward types. Susceptibility rates were generally lower than the global average, especially among MEM-NS isolates and isolates from non-ICU wards. The proportion of MBL-positive isolates in the MEM-NS subset was only slightly higher in LA than globally (19.2% and 19.5% in ICU and non-ICU wards, respectively), suggesting the presence of additional resistance mechanisms. Only colistin exceeded the activity of CAZ-AVI against isolates collected globally and in LA. Conclusion CAZ-AVI showed potent antimicrobial activity, second only to that of colistin, against P. aeruginosa isolates from both ICU and non-ICU wards, with >88% of isolates collected globally testing as susceptible. Activity was in part compromised by MBLs, although additional resistance mechanisms may also be responsible. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.