z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
508. Title Favipiravir for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019; A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study
Author(s) -
Rand A. Alattar,
Shiema Ahmed,
Tasneem Abdallah,
Rashid Kazman,
Aseelah Qadmour,
Tawheeda Ibrahim,
Bassem Al Hariri,
Shahd H. Shaar,
Abeer Bajwa,
Abeir Alimam,
Rabia Qazi,
Fatma Ben Abid,
Joanne Daghfal,
Ali M. Eldeeb,
Kinda Shukri,
Ahmed Elsayed,
Fatima Rustom,
Musaed Alsamawi,
Alaaeldin Abdelmajid,
Miguel A. Paulino Basulto,
Armando A. R. Cobian,
Mohammed Abu Khattab,
Muna Almaslamani,
Abdullatif Al Khal,
Ali S. Omrani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.707
Subject(s) - medicine , favipiravir , hazard ratio , confidence interval , propensity score matching , clinical endpoint , cohort , proportional hazards model , clinical trial , covid-19 , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Background We investigated clinical outcomes of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods Patients who between 23 May 2020 and 18 July 2020 received ≥24 hours of favipiravir were assigned to the favipiravir group, while those who did not formed the non-favipiravir group. The primary outcome was 28-day clinical improvement, defined as two-category improvement from baseline on an 8-point ordinal scale. Propensity scores (PS) for favipiravir therapy were used for 1:1 matching. Cox regression was used to examine associations with the primary endpoint. Results The unmatched cohort included 1,493 patients, of which 51.7% were in the favipiravir group, and 48.3% were not receiving supplemental oxygen at baseline (table 1). Favipiravir was started within a median of 5 days from symptoms onset. Significant baseline differences between the two unmatched groups existed, but not between the PSmatched groups (N = 774) (table 1). After PS-matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the proportion with 28-day clinical improvement (93.3% versus 92.8%, P 0.780), or 28-day all-cause mortality (2.1% versus 3.1%, P 0.360) (Table 2). Favipiravir was associated with more viral clearance by day 28 (79.8% versus 64.1%, P < 0.001) (table 2). In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, favipiravir therapy was not associated 28-day clinical improvement (adjusted hazard ratio 0.978, 95% confidence interval 0.862 –1.109, P 0.726) (Table 3).Conclusion Favipiravir therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia is well tolerated but is not associated with an increased likelihood of clinical improvement or reduced all-cause mortality by 28 days. Disclosures All Authors : No reported disclosures

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom