z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
927. Antiretroviral Laboratory Monitoring and Implications for HIV Clinical Care in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond
Author(s) -
Lori E. Fantry,
Lawrence York,
Julia M. Fisher,
Jessica August,
José Luis Márquez,
Kristen Ellis,
Lakshmi Malladi,
Ashwini Kaveti,
Marine Khachatryan,
Marissa K. Paz,
Matthew Adams,
Edward J. Bedrick
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1113
Subject(s) - medicine , renal function , diabetes mellitus , confidence interval , multivariate analysis , rate ratio , pediatrics , endocrinology
Background In the era of COVID-19, providers are delaying laboratory testing in people with HIV (PWH) to avoid unnecessary exposures despite antiretroviral guidelines recommending periodic testing. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical significance of periodic renal, liver, and lipid testing. Methods We reviewed the charts of 265 people with HIV (PWH) who initiated outpatient care at HIV clinic between 1/1/16 and 12/21/18 and had at least two clinic visits. Analysis included frequency distributions, descriptive statistics, one-sided binomial exact tests, and Poisson models with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Eighty-five percent (221) of PWH had no laboratory abnormalities while on antiretroviral therapy (ART). The most common abnormality was a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min found in 10% of PWH. Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (DM) was associated with an increased risk of GFR < 60 ml/min (estimated rate ratio 2.68, 95% CI 1.35-5.33) and age < 60 years (estimated rate ratio .122, 95% CI .05-.32) was associated with a decreased risk (estimated rate ratio .24, CI .14 –.43). When a GFR was < 60 ml/min or an AST or ALT was >2X upper limit of normal (ULN), no action was taken in 52% of the cases. When an action was taken, the most common action was to repeat testing (18%). After a lipid panel result, the most common actions were to calculate a 10-year cardiovascular risk score (32%) and add a statin (18%). Taking action after lipid panel results was strongly associated with age ≥ 40 (estimated rate ratio 9.1, 95% CI 3.3-25). ART was changed in seven PWH based on GFR, AST/ALT, or lipid panel results. There were four individuals with poor outcomes including cerebrovascular accident, acute renal failure, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death. Contributing factors were hypertension, DM, and hypercholesterolemia. Conclusion Individuals < 40 years without ithout comorbidities had a low risk of having clinically significant renal and liver function abnormalities and rarely had actions taken after renal, liver, or lipid results. In the era of COVID-19 and beyond, it may be prudent for in certain groups to delay or eliminate liver, renal, and lipid testing to eliminate exposure, reduce cost, and avoid patient anxiety. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom