z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in Novel Coronavirus (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) Test Positivity in North Carolina
Author(s) -
Nicholas Turner,
William Pan,
Viviana Martínez-Bianchi,
Gabriela M. Maradiaga Panayotti,
Arrianna Marie Planey,
Christopher W. Woods,
Paul M. Lantos
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofaa413
Subject(s) - medicine , demography , odds , odds ratio , population , socioeconomic status , health equity , pandemic , ethnic group , confidence interval , gerontology , logistic regression , covid-19 , environmental health , public health , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , nursing , sociology , anthropology
Background Emerging evidence suggests that black and Hispanic communities in the United States are disproportionately affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A complex interplay of socioeconomic and healthcare disparities likely contribute to disproportionate COVID-19 risk. Methods We conducted a geospatial analysis to determine whether individual- and neighborhood-level attributes predict local odds of testing positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We analyzed 29 138 SARS-CoV-2 tests within the 6-county catchment area for Duke University Health System from March to June 2020. We used generalized additive models to analyze the spatial distribution of SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Adjusted models included individual-level age, gender, and race, as well as neighborhood-level Area Deprivation Index, population density, demographic composition, and household size. Results Our dataset included 27 099 negative and 2039 positive unique SARS-CoV-2 tests. The odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were higher for males (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.30–1.58), blacks (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.27–1.70), and Hispanics (OR, 4.25; 955 CI, 3.55–5.12). Among neighborhood-level predictors, percentage of black population (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.25), and percentage Hispanic population (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07–1.41) also influenced the odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Population density, average household size, and Area Deprivation Index were not associated with SARS-CoV-2 test results after adjusting for race. Conclusions The odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 were higher for both black and Hispanic individuals, as well as within neighborhoods with a higher proportion of black or Hispanic residents—confirming that black and Hispanic communities are disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom