data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Reduction and Timing of Intervention Versus Functional Benefit and Survival in the MISTIE III and STICH Trials
Author(s) -
Sean Polster,
Julián CarriónPenagos,
Seán B. Lyne,
Barbara Gregson,
Ying Cao,
Richard E. Thompson,
Agnieszka Stadnik,
Romuald Girard,
Patricia Lynn Money,
Karen Lane,
Nichol McBee,
Wendy Ziai,
W. Andrew Mould,
Ahmed Iqbal,
Stephen Metcalfe,
Yi Hao,
Robert Dodd,
Andrew P. Carlson,
Paul J. Camarata,
J. Caron,
Mark R. Harrigan,
Mario Zuccarello,
A. D. Mendelow,
Daniel F. Hanley,
Issam A. Awad
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
neurosurgery/neurosurgery online
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.455
H-Index - 198
eISSN - 1081-1281
pISSN - 0148-396X
DOI - 10.1093/neuros/nyaa572
Subject(s) - medicine , intracerebral hemorrhage , modified rankin scale , surgery , thrombolysis , subarachnoid hemorrhage , ischemic stroke , ischemia , myocardial infarction
The extent of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) removal conferred survival and functional benefits in the minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) III trial. It is unclear whether this similarly impacts outcome with craniotomy (open surgery) or whether timing from ictus to intervention influences outcome with either procedure.