English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The current guideline treatment for patients with diabetes and nephropathy to lower the high risk of renal and cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality is based on results of clinical studies that have tested new drugs in large groups of patients with diabetes and high renal/CV risk. Although this has delivered breakthrough therapies like angiotensin receptor blockers, the residual renal/CV risk remains extremely high. Many subsequent trials have tried to further reduce this residual renal/CV risk, without much success. Post hoc analyses have indicated that these failures are, at least partly, due to a large variability in response between and within the patients. The current ‘group approach’ to designing and evaluating new drugs, as well as group-oriented drug registration and guideline recommendations, does not take this individual response variation into account. Like with antibiotics and cancer treatment, a more individual approach is warranted to effectively optimize individual results. New tools to better evaluate the individual risk change have been developed for improved clinical trial design and to avoid trial failures. One of these tools, the composite multiple parameter response efficacy score , is based on monitoring changes in all available risk factors and integrating them into a prediction of ultimate renal and CV risk reduction. This score has also been modelled into a clinical decision support system for use in monitoring and changing the therapy in individual patients to protect them from renal/CV events. In conclusion, future treatment of renal/CV risk in diabetes should transition from an era of ‘one size fits all’ into the new era of ‘a fit for each size’.

nephrology dialysis transplantation

Time for clinical decision support systems tailoring individual patient therapy to improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes and nephropathy