z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
OUP accepted manuscript
Author(s) -
Jonas Olson
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the monist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.261
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 2153-3601
pISSN - 0026-9662
DOI - 10.1093/monist/onw021
Subject(s) - intuitionism , moral realism , epistemology , philosophy , relation (database) , analytic philosophy , focus (optics) , realism , moral psychology , contemporary philosophy , physics , database , computer science , optics
This paper explores Franz Brentano’s metaethics by comparing it to Thomas Reid’s. Brentano and Reid share a commitment to moral realism and they are both aptly classified as intuitionists concerning moral knowledge and the nature of moral judgement. However, their respective versions of inuitionism are importantly different, in ways that reflect more general differences between their respective epistemological views. Sections III and IV of the paper focus more exclusively on Brentano’s metaethics and some of its unorthodox features. These features tie in with notorious difficulties for moral realism concerning the nature of moral truth and the relation between moral judgement and motivation to act.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom