
Nonprofits: A Public Policy Tool for the Promotion of Community Subjective Well-being
Author(s) -
Robert W. Ressler,
Pamela Paxton,
Kristopher Velasco,
Lilla Pivnick,
Inbar Weiss,
Johannes C. Eichstaedt
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of public administration research and theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.154
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1477-9803
pISSN - 1053-1858
DOI - 10.1093/jopart/muab010
Subject(s) - disengagement theory , promotion (chess) , per capita , panel data , public policy , association (psychology) , subjective well being , civic engagement , social psychology , sample (material) , psychology , public relations , public economics , political science , happiness , sociology , economics , economic growth , politics , econometrics , law , gerontology , medicine , population , chemistry , demography , chromatography , psychotherapist
Looking to supplement common economic indicators, politicians and policymakers are increasingly interested in how to measure and improve the subjective well-being of communities. Theories about nonprofit organizations suggest that they represent a potential policy-amenable lever to increase community subjective well-being. Using longitudinal cross-lagged panel models with IRS and Twitter data, this study explores whether communities with higher numbers of nonprofits per capita exhibit greater subjective well-being in the form of more expressions of positive emotion, engagement, and relationships. We find associations, robust to sample bias concerns, between most types of nonprofit organizations and decreases in negative emotions, negative sentiments about relationships, and disengagement. We also find an association between nonprofit presence and the proportion of words tweeted in a county that indicate engagement. These findings contribute to our theoretical understanding of why nonprofit organizations matter for community-level outcomes and how they should be considered an important public policy lever.