z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Systematic Review of Estimating Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Population Level With Administrative Data
Author(s) -
Hava Izci,
Tim Tambuyzer,
Krizia Tuand,
Victoria Depoorter,
Annouschka Laenen,
Hans Wildiers,
Ignace Vergote,
Liesbet Van Eycken,
Harlinde De Schutter,
Freija Verdoodt,
Patrick Neven
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jnci journal of the national cancer institute
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1460-2105
pISSN - 0027-8874
DOI - 10.1093/jnci/djaa050
Subject(s) - breast cancer , confidence interval , meta analysis , logistic regression , medicine , population , systematic review , algorithm , statistics , machine learning , medline , cancer , computer science , data mining , mathematics , environmental health , political science , law
Background Exact numbers of breast cancer recurrences are currently unknown at the population level, because they are challenging to actively collect. Previously, real-world data such as administrative claims have been used within expert- or data-driven (machine learning) algorithms for estimating cancer recurrence. We present the first systematic review and meta-analysis, to our knowledge, of publications estimating breast cancer recurrence at the population level using algorithms based on administrative data. Methods The systematic literature search followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We evaluated and compared sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of algorithms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model to obtain a pooled estimate of accuracy. Results Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Most articles used information from medical files as the gold standard, defined as any recurrence. Two studies included bone metastases only in the definition of recurrence. Fewer studies used a model-based approach (decision trees or logistic regression) (41.2%) compared with studies using detection rules without specified model (58.8%). The generalized linear mixed model for all recurrence types reported an accuracy of 92.2% (95% confidence interval = 88.4% to 94.8%). Conclusions Publications reporting algorithms for detecting breast cancer recurrence are limited in number and heterogeneous. A thorough analysis of the existing algorithms demonstrated the need for more standardization and validation. The meta-analysis reported a high accuracy overall, which indicates algorithms as promising tools to identify breast cancer recurrence at the population level. The rule-based approach combined with emerging machine learning algorithms could be interesting to explore in the future.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom