z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
First application of the Canadian parody exception
Author(s) -
Sabine Jacques
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of intellectual property law and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.252
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1747-1540
pISSN - 1747-1532
DOI - 10.1093/jiplp/jpx167
Subject(s) - confusion , law , political science , copyright act , copyright law , section (typography) , business , intellectual property , advertising , psychology , psychoanalysis
United Airlines, Inc v Jeremy Cooperstock (2017) FC 616 (Untied.com), 23 June 2017 In its Untied.com decision of 23 June 2017 the Canadian Federal Court confirmed the lack of a parody exception in trade mark law (Trade-Marks Act, RSC 1985, c T-13) and denied the applicability of the parody exception in copyright law (section 29 of the Copyright Act 1985, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) on grounds of confusion

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom