z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Examination of Follow-up Services Received by Vulnerable Burn Populations: A Burn Model System National Database Study
Author(s) -
Lynne Benavides,
Vivian L. Shie,
Brennan Yee,
Miranda Yelvington,
L C Simko,
Audrey E Wolfe,
Kara McMullen,
Janelle Epp,
Ingrid Parry,
Rachel Shon,
Radha Holavanahalli,
David N. Herndon,
Marta Rosenberg,
Laura Rosenberg,
Walter J. Meyer,
Nicole S. Gibran,
Shelley A. Wiechman,
Colleen M Ryan,
Jeffrey C. Schneider
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of burn care and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.679
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1559-0488
pISSN - 1559-047X
DOI - 10.1093/jbcr/irz185
Subject(s) - medicine , national database , burn units , burn injury , medical emergency , emergency medicine , database , surgery , computer science
While disparities in healthcare outcomes and services for vulnerable populations have been documented, the extent to which vulnerable burn populations demonstrate disparities in long-term care is relatively underexplored. This study's goal was to assess for differences in long-term occupational or physical therapy (OT/PT) and psychological service use after burn injury in vulnerable populations. Data from the Burn Model System National Database (2006-2015) were analyzed. The vulnerable group included participants in one or more of these categories: 65 years of age or older, nonwhite, no insurance or Medicaid insurance, preinjury receipt of psychological therapy or counseling, preinjury alcohol and/or drug misuse, or with a preexisting disability. Primary outcomes investigated were receipt of OT/PT and psychological services. Secondary outcomes included nine OT/PT subcategories. Outcomes were examined at 6, 12, and 24 months postinjury. One thousand one hundred thirty-six burn survivors (692 vulnerable; 444 nonvulnerable) were included. The vulnerable group was mostly female, unemployed at time of injury, and with smaller burns. Both groups received similar OT/PT and psychological services at all time points. Adjusted regression analyses found that while the groups received similar amounts services, some vulnerable subgroups received significantly more services. Participants 65 years of age or older, who received psychological therapy or counseling prior to injury, and with a preexisting disability received more OT/PT and psychological or peer support services at follow-up. Overall, vulnerable and nonvulnerable groups received comparable OT/PT and psychological services. The importance of long-term care among vulnerable subgroups of the burn population is highlighted by this study. Future work is needed to determine adequate levels of follow-up services.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here