Operationalizing and analyzing 2-step gender identity questions: Methodological and ethical considerations | Zendy

Kacie M. Kidd | Zendy; Gina M. Sequeira | Zendy; Scott D. Rothenberger | Zendy; Taylor Paglisotti | Zendy; Álfgeir L. Kristjánsson | Zendy; Kelsey Schweiberger | Zendy; Elizabeth Miller | Zendy; Robert W. S. Coulter | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Operationalizing and analyzing 2-step gender identity questions: Methodological and ethical considerations

Author(s) -

Kacie M. Kidd,

Gina M. Sequeira,

Scott D. Rothenberger,

Taylor Paglisotti,

Álfgeir L. Kristjánsson,

Kelsey Schweiberger,

Elizabeth Miller,

Robert W. S. Coulter

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

journal of the american medical informatics association

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.614

H-Index - 150

eISSN - 1527-974X

pISSN - 1067-5027

DOI - 10.1093/jamia/ocab137

Subject(s) - operationalization , gender identity , identity (music) , suicidal ideation , gender identity disorder , psychology , computer science , social psychology , data science , medicine , poison control , human factors and ergonomics , epistemology , medical emergency , philosophy , physics , acoustics

Two-step questions to assess gender identity are recommended for optimizing care delivery for gender-diverse individuals. As gender identity fields are increasingly integrated into electronic health records, guidance is needed on how to analyze these data. The goal of this study was to assess potential approaches for analyzing 2-step gender identity questions and the impact of each on suicidal ideation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research