English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This article draws the attention of refugee law scholarship to a troubling anomaly. It first illustrates how the 1951 Refugee Convention is fundamentally concerned with symptomatically addressing the casting out of refugees from the State-based international order by resolving their anomalous legal status. It then demonstrates, based on the Libyan example, that when confronted with State disintegration, the law fails to do justice to its original purpose. In reflecting on the significance of this phenomenon of ‘anomaly upon anomaly’, the article suggests an exploration of State-transcending models of jurisdiction.

Anomaly upon Anomaly: The 1951 Convention and State Disintegration