Open AccessRACIAL-ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN ATTITUDES TOWARD PASSIVE AND ACTIVE EUTHANASIA
Author(s) -
Sara M. Moorman
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
innovation in aging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2399-5300
DOI - 10.1093/geroni/igz038.1590
Subject(s) - ethnic group , immigration , opposition (politics) , people of color , public opinion , psychology , medicine , gerontology , social psychology , demography , race (biology) , political science , gender studies , sociology , law , politics
This paper examined racial/ethnic differences in opinions about passive euthanasia (withdrawing or withholding treatment), suicide, and physician-assisted suicide. Data came from 1,832 participants in the 2013 Pew Religion and Public Life Project. Respondents from all racial/ethnic backgrounds were most likely to favor multiple forms of euthanasia. However, persons of color had a wider variety of opinions about euthanasia than did non-Hispanic whites. In multivariate multinomial logistic regressions, non-Hispanic whites had a 63% chance of approving broadly of euthanasia, while non-Hispanic blacks had a 40% chance, and Hispanics, a 49% chance. Opposition to euthanasia was most common among people with multiple disadvantages (e.g., educational attainment, immigrant status). Neither trust in health care providers nor recent experience with the death of a loved one explained these group differences. Results highlight large differences of opinion between the people who set policy and practice guidelines and those who lack this power and access.