z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Considering Gender Within the Four Theoretical Domains of Subjective Age
Author(s) -
Shelbie Turner,
Richard A. Settersten,
Karen Hooker
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
innovation in aging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2399-5300
DOI - 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1826
Subject(s) - construct (python library) , scholarship , psychology , gender identity , identity (music) , perception , domain (mathematical analysis) , presentation (obstetrics) , developmental psychology , age groups , social psychology , gender studies , sociology , political science , demography , computer science , medicine , mathematical analysis , physics , mathematics , neuroscience , acoustics , law , radiology , programming language
The broad construct of subjective age is informed by four theoretical domains – self-perceptions of aging, old age stereotypes, age identity, and awareness of age related change (Kotter-Gruhn, Kornadt, & Stephan, 2016). Each of the theoretical domains is distinct yet interconnected, and analyzing how gender operates within each yields a more nuanced understanding of gender’s influence on subjective age. In our presentation, we will offer a review of researchers’ consideration of gender in studies of each subjective age theoretical domain, describing (1) how gender has and has not been included, (2) key findings when gender has been included, and (3) insights into how researchers might better include – or even center – gender when studying each domain. In so doing, we highlight the contributions of past scholarship on gender and subjective age and offer insights for future studies on the topic.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here