Open AccessTHE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. XVI. EXCESS OF ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE OF VIABILITY
Author(s) -
Terumi Mukai,
Shuji Nagano
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.792
H-Index - 246
eISSN - 1943-2631
pISSN - 0016-6731
DOI - 10.1093/genetics/105.1.115
Subject(s) - overdominance , biology , polygene , lethal allele , diallel cross , genetics , population , dominance (genetics) , drosophila melanogaster , heterozygote advantage , genetic load , effective population size , major gene , quantitative trait locus , evolutionary biology , genotype , gene , genetic variation , allele , inbreeding , botany , demography , hybrid , sociology
About 500 second and 500 third chromosomes were extracted, using the marked inversion technique, from the Orlando-Lake Placid, Florida, population. From the experiments using these chromosomes, the following findings were obtained: (1) The frequencies of lethal-carrying chromosomes were 0.37 in the second and 0.55 in the third chromosomes. (2) The size of the population was estimated to be effectively infinite, on the basis of the allelism rate of lethal-carrying chromosomes. (3) The detrimental and lethal loads for viability were, respectively, 0.40 and 0.45 for the second and 0.52 and 0.78 for the third chromosomes. Consequently, the detrimental to lethal load ratio is 0.90 for the second and 0.67 for the third chromosomes. (4) Lethal genes were shown to be deleterious when heterozygous. (5) The average degree of dominance for mildly deleterious genes (viability polygenes) was estimated to be nearly 0.5, although the confidence interval is large. (6) Additive (sigma( 2) (A)) and dominance (sigma(2) ( D)) variances of viability were estimated by using a partial diallel cross method. The results were (see PDF) and (see PDF) for the second chromosomes. (7) Environmental variances of viability were estimated. The result indicates that the heterozygotes are more homeostatic than the homozygotes. The most striking finding is that the additive variance is larger than expected on the classical hypothesis from the detrimental load. Several possible explanations for the discrepancy are offered. The most likely cause, we suggest, is genotype-environment interaction (diversifying selection) acting on viability polygenes. Overdominance is inconsistent with the low dominance variance, and frequency-dependent selection also appears unlikely as an explanation.