Premium
Comparison of acute and chronic impact of adaptive servo‐ventilation on left chamber geometry and function in patients with chronic heart failure
Author(s) -
Haruki Nobuhiko,
Takeuchi Masaaki,
Kaku Kyoko,
Yoshitani Hidetoshi,
Kuwaki Hiroshi,
Tamura Masahito,
Abe Haruhiko,
Okazaki Masahiro,
Tsutsumi Akizumi,
Otsuji Yutaka
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr103
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , heart failure , afterload , stroke volume , cardiac output , ventilation (architecture) , stroke (engine) , mitral regurgitation , blood pressure , ejection fraction , mechanical engineering , engineering
Aims The aim of this study was to determine differences in the acute and chronic impact of adaptive servo‐ventilation (ASV) on left chamber geometry and function in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods and results An acute ASV study was performed to measure echocardiographic parameters before and 30 min after the initiation of ASV therapy in 30 CHF patients (mean age: 69 years, 23 male). The chronic effects of ASV therapy were also evaluated in 26 of these 30 patients over a mean follow‐up period of 24 weeks. Patients were divided into two groups according to the status of ASV therapy [ASV group ( n = 15) and withdrawal group ( n = 11)]. In the acute study, heart rate and blood pressure were significantly decreased 30 min after the ASV therapy compared with baseline. Stroke volume and cardiac output were significantly increased in conjunction with a reduction in systemic vascular resistance. Multivariate regression analysis revealed baseline E/e′ to be an independent predictor for absolute increase in cardiac output. In the chronic study, a significant reduction of left ventricular (LV)/left atrial (LA) volumes and the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR), and improved LV diastolic function parameters were noted in the ASV group. These beneficial effects were not observed in the withdrawal group. Conclusion The acute beneficial impact of ASV is mainly associated with the reduction of afterload resulting in an increase in stroke volume and cardiac output. In contrast, chronic ASV therapy produces LV and LA reverse remodelling resulting in an improvement in LV function and the severity of MR in patients with CHF.