Open AccessUS fathers’ reports of bonding, infant temperament and psychosocial stress based on family sleep arrangements
Author(s) -
Lee T. Gettler,
Patty X. Kuo,
Mallika S. Sarma,
Jennifer Burke Lefever,
E. Mark Cummings,
James J. McKenna,
Julia M. BraungartRieker
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
evolution, medicine and public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2050-6201
DOI - 10.1093/emph/eoab038
Subject(s) - psychosocial , temperament , developmental psychology , psychology , breastfeeding , clinical psychology , medicine , psychiatry , social psychology , personality , pediatrics
Background and objectives Evolutionary-grounded sleep research has been critical to establishing the mutual dependence of breastfeeding and nighttime sleep proximity for mothers and infants. Evolutionary perspectives on cosleeping also often emphasize the emotional motivations for and potential benefits of sleep proximity, including for parent-infant bonding. However, this potential link between infant sleep location and bonding remains understudied for both mothers and fathers. Moreover, in Euro-American contexts bedsharing has been linked to family stress and difficult child temperament, primarily via maternal reports. We know relatively little about whether paternal psychosocial dynamics differ based on family sleep arrangements, despite fathers and other kin often being present in the cosleeping environment across cultures. Here, we aim to help address some of these gaps in knowledge pertaining to fathers and family sleep arrangements. Methodology Drawing on a sample of Midwestern U.S. fathers (N=195), we collected sociodemographic and survey data to analyze links between infant nighttime sleep location, paternal psychosocial well-being, father-infant bonding, and infant temperament. From fathers’ reports, families were characterized as routinely solitary sleeping, bedsharing, or roomsharing (without bedsharing). Results We found that routinely roomsharing or bedsharing fathers, respectively, reported stronger bonding than solitary sleepers. Bedsharing fathers also reported that their infants had more negative temperaments and also tended to report greater parenting-related stress due to difficulties with their children. Conclusions These cross-sectional results help to highlight how a practice with deep phylogenetic and evolutionary history, such as cosleeping, can be variably expressed within communities with the potential for family-dependent benefits or strains.