Premium
Different positioning of the ligand‐binding domain helix 12 and the F domain of the estrogen receptor accounts for functional differences between agonists and antagonists
Author(s) -
Nichols Mark,
Rientjes Jeanette M.J.,
Stewart A. Francis
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
the embo journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.484
H-Index - 392
eISSN - 1460-2075
pISSN - 0261-4189
DOI - 10.1093/emboj/17.3.765
Subject(s) - biology , estrogen receptor , domain (mathematical analysis) , receptor , helix (gastropod) , microbiology and biotechnology , estrogen , ligand (biochemistry) , computational biology , genetics , ecology , cancer , breast cancer , snail , mathematical analysis , mathematics
The estrogen receptor is capable of binding a diverse set of ligands that are broadly categorized as agonists or antagonists, depending on their abilities to induce or interfere with transcriptional responsiveness. We show, using a fusion protein assay for ligand‐binding which does not rely on transcriptional responsiveness, that agonists and antagonists differently position the C‐terminus of the ligand‐binding domain (helix 12) and the F domain. Upon antagonist binding, the F domain interferes with the fusion protein activity. Mutational disruption of helix 12 alters the position of the F domain, imposing interference after agonist or antagonist binding. Genetically selected inversion mutations where only agonists, but not antagonists, induce interference are similarly reliant on helix 12 and F domain positioning. Our results demonstrate that agonists and antagonists differently position helix 12 and implicate the F domain in mechanisms of antagonist action.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom