Open AccessPercutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Fabrizio D’Ascenzo,
Ovidio De Filippo,
Edoardo Elia,
Mattia Doronzo,
Pierluigi Omedè,
Antonio Montefusco,
Mauro Pen,
Stefano Salizzoni,
Federico Conrotto,
Guglielmo Gallone,
Filippo Angelini,
Luca Franchin,
Francesco Bruno,
Massimo Boffini,
Mario Gaudino,
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european heart journal. quality of care and clinical outcomes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.766
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 2058-5225
pISSN - 2058-1742
DOI - 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa041
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , myocardial infarction , revascularization , conventional pci , clinical endpoint , stroke (engine) , odds ratio , confidence interval , randomized controlled trial , subgroup analysis , stenosis , surgery , engineering , mechanical engineering
A 5-year survival of patients with unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis according to the choice of revascularization (percutaneous vs. surgical) remains to be defined.