Percutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trials | Zendy

Fabrizio D’Ascenzo | Zendy; Ovidio De Filippo | Zendy; Edoardo Elia | Zendy; Mattia Doronzo | Zendy; Pierluigi Omedè | Zendy; Antonio Montefusco | Zendy; Mauro Pen | Zendy; Stefano Salizzoni | Zendy; Federico De Marco | Zendy; Guglielmo Gallone | Zendy; Filippo Angelini | Zendy; Luca Franchin | Zendy; Francesco Bruno | Zendy; Massimo Boffini | Zendy; Mario Gaudino | Zendy; Mauro Rinaldi | Zendy; Gaetano Maria De Ferrari | Zendy

Open Access

Percutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trials

Author(s) -

Fabrizio D’Ascenzo,

Ovidio De Filippo,

Edoardo Elia,

Mattia Doronzo,

Pierluigi Omedè,

Antonio Montefusco,

Mauro Pen,

Stefano Salizzoni,

Federico De Marco,

Guglielmo Gallone,

Filippo Angelini,

Luca Franchin,

Francesco Bruno,

Massimo Boffini,

Mario Gaudino,

Mauro Rinaldi,

Gaetano Maria De Ferrari

Publication year - 2020

Publication title -

european heart journal - quality of care and clinical outcomes

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.766

H-Index - 18

eISSN - 2058-5225

pISSN - 2058-1742

DOI - 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa041

Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , myocardial infarction , revascularization , conventional pci , clinical endpoint , stroke (engine) , odds ratio , confidence interval , randomized controlled trial , subgroup analysis , stenosis , surgery , engineering , mechanical engineering

A 5-year survival of patients with unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis according to the choice of revascularization (percutaneous vs. surgical) remains to be defined.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research