Patient-reported outcome measures in dysphagia: a systematic review of instrument development and validation | Zendy

Dhyanesh A. Patel | Zendy; Rohit Sharda | Zendy; Kristen L. Hovis | Zendy; Ervin E. Nichols | Zendy; Nila A Sathe | Zendy; David F. Penson | Zendy; Irene D. Feurer | Zendy; Melissa L McPheeters | Zendy; Michael F. Vaezi | Zendy; David O. Francis | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Patient-reported outcome measures in dysphagia: a systematic review of instrument development and validation

Author(s) -

Dhyanesh A. Patel,

Rohit Sharda,

Kristen L. Hovis,

Ervin E. Nichols,

Nila A Sathe,

David F. Penson,

Irene D. Feurer,

Melissa L McPheeters,

Michael F. Vaezi,

David O. Francis

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

diseases of the esophagus

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.115

H-Index - 63

eISSN - 1442-2050

pISSN - 1120-8694

DOI - 10.1093/dote/dow028

Subject(s) - medicine , dysphagia , patient reported outcome , outcome (game theory) , physical therapy , intensive care medicine , surgery , nursing , quality of life (healthcare) , mathematical economics , mathematics

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are commonly used to capture patient experience with dysphagia and to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Inappropriate application can lead to distorted results in clinical studies. A systematic review of the literature on dysphagia-related PRO measures was performed to (1) identify all currently available measures and (2) to evaluate each for the presence of important measurement properties that would affect their applicability.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research