z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Review of the Most Commonly Used Methods for Sample Collection in Environmental Surveillance of Poliovirus
Author(s) -
G. Matrajt,
Brienughton,
Ananda S Bandyopadhyay,
John Scott Meschke
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciy638
Subject(s) - poliovirus , polyethylene glycol , peg ratio , sampling (signal processing) , medicine , microporous material , chromatography , filtration (mathematics) , sample (material) , environmental science , virology , virus , computer science , chemistry , statistics , biochemistry , mathematics , organic chemistry , finance , filter (signal processing) , economics , computer vision
We performed a review of the environmental surveillance methods commonly used to collect and concentrate poliovirus (PV) from water samples. We compared the sampling approaches (trap vs grab), the process methods (precipitation vs filtration), and the various tools and chemical reagents used to separate PV from other viruses and pathogens in water samples (microporous glass, pads, polyethylene glycol [PEG]/dextran, PEG/sodium chloride, NanoCeram/ViroCap, and ester membranes). The advantages and disadvantages of each method are considered, and the geographical areas where they are currently used are discussed. Several methods have demonstrated the ability to concentrate and recover PVs from environmental samples. The details of the particular sampling conditions and locations should be considered carefully in method selection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom