z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Hydroxychloroquine as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Workers: A Randomized Trial
Author(s) -
Radha Rajasingham,
Ananta Bangdiwala,
Melanie R. Nicol,
Caleb P Skipper,
Katelyn A Pastick,
Margaret L. Axelrod,
Matthew F Pullen,
Alanna A Nascene,
Darlisha A Williams,
Nicole Engen,
Elizabeth C Okafor,
Brian I. Rini,
Ingrid A. Mayer,
Emily G. McDonald,
Todd C. Lee,
Peter Li,
Lauren MacKenzie,
Justin M. Balko,
Stephen J. Dunlop,
Katherine Huppler Hullsiek,
David R. Boulware,
Sarah M Lofgren,
Mahsa Abassi,
Andrew Balster,
Lindsey Collins,
Glen Drobot,
Douglas Krakower,
Sylvain Lother,
Dylan MacKay,
Cameron MeyerMueller,
Stephen Selinsky,
Dayna Solvason,
Ryan Zarychanski,
Rebecca Zash
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.44
H-Index - 336
eISSN - 1537-6591
pISSN - 1058-4838
DOI - 10.1093/cid/ciaa1571
Subject(s) - hydroxychloroquine , medicine , placebo , pre exposure prophylaxis , randomized controlled trial , hazard ratio , clinical endpoint , dosing , pandemic , covid-19 , emergency medicine , disease , confidence interval , immunology , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , syphilis , men who have sex with men , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , alternative medicine
Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a rapidly emerging virus causing the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with no known effective prophylaxis. We investigated whether hydroxychloroquine could prevent SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers at high risk of exposure. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of healthcare workers with ongoing exposure to persons with SARS-CoV-2, including those working in emergency departments, intensive care units, COVID-19 hospital wards, and first responders. Participants across the United States and in the Canadian province of Manitoba were randomized to hydroxychloroquine loading dose then 400 mg once or twice weekly for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was confirmed or probable COVID-19–compatible illness. We measured hydroxychloroquine whole-blood concentrations. Results We enrolled 1483 healthcare workers, of whom 79% reported performing aerosol-generating procedures. The incidence of COVID-19 (laboratory-confirmed or symptomatic compatible illness) was 0.27 events/person-year with once-weekly and 0.28 events/person-year with twice-weekly hydroxychloroquine compared with 0.38 events/person-year with placebo. For once-weekly hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis, the hazard ratio was .72 (95% CI, .44–1.16; P = .18) and for twice-weekly was .74 (95% CI, .46–1.19; P = .22) compared with placebo. Median hydroxychloroquine concentrations in whole blood were 98 ng/mL (IQR, 82–120) with once-weekly and 200 ng/mL (IQR, 159–258) with twice-weekly dosing. Hydroxychloroquine concentrations did not differ between participants who developed COVID-19–compatible illness (154 ng/mL) versus participants without COVID-19 (133 ng/mL; P = .08). Conclusions Pre-exposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine once or twice weekly did not significantly reduce laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 or COVID-19–compatible illness among healthcare workers. Clinical Trials Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04328467.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom