z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Self-Governance or Professionalized Paternalism?: The Police, Contractual Injunctions and the Differential Management of Deviant Populations
Author(s) -
Daniel McCarthy
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the british journal of criminology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.404
H-Index - 94
eISSN - 1464-3529
pISSN - 0007-0955
DOI - 10.1093/bjc/azq026
Subject(s) - paternalism , corporate governance , social control , control (management) , criminology , sociology , self governance , crime control , political science , law , criminal justice , business , management , economics , finance
Contractual injunctions have emerged as key instruments of social control. They provide agencies such as the police with unique powers to manage deviant persons by forcing the recipients, via the threat of criminal sanction on breach of the injunction, to engage in self-control of their behaviour. This article develops understandings of how contractual injunctions are actually used in practice by the police. Analyses of the different ways contractual injunctions are directed at certain social groups are developed in relation to police occupational cultures that place limits and possibilities on their application. It concludes by locating the broader social effects of contractual injunctions with issues of urban marginality and growing powers to criminalize social predicaments

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom