Premium
Energy, Backstop Endogeneity, and the Optimal Use of Groundwater
Author(s) -
Roumasset James,
Wada Christopher A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
american journal of agricultural economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.949
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1467-8276
pISSN - 0002-9092
DOI - 10.1093/ajae/aau025
Subject(s) - desalination , groundwater , drawdown (hydrology) , water energy nexus , natural resource economics , environmental science , economics , aquifer , water resource management , nexus (standard) , computer science , engineering , genetics , geotechnical engineering , membrane , biology , embedded system
To meet the growing demand for freshwater, many regions have increased groundwater pumping in recent years, resulting in declining groundwater levels worldwide. A promising development to address these declines is technical change regarding groundwater substitutes such as desalination and wastewater recycling. However, because these technologies are energy intensive, optimal implementation also depends on future energy price trends. We provide an operational model for the case of reverse‐osmosis seawater desalination. In an application to the Pearl Harbor Aquifer in Hawaii, we find that allowing the cost of desalination to increase at an average annual rate of 2.4% over the next century results in a substantially steeper efficiency price path for water. The higher prices decrease optimal groundwater extraction and induce a slower head drawdown over a longer period of time, thereby delaying the transition to desalination by over 30 years. Because the rise in energy costs exacerbates efficiency losses from under‐pricing, any delay in implementing efficiency pricing will cause either a greater future increase in prices or the need for rationing. Reforming prices sooner rather than later may be more politically feasible, given that consumers may be more amenable to a gradual rise in prices today than a sudden doubling or tripling of prices ten years from now. Using this as a foundation, we outline a research agenda for extending the framework to other groundwater substitutes and for adapting to climate change.