Premium
The Effects of Farm Commodity and Retail Food Policies on Obesity and Economic Welfare in the United States
Author(s) -
Okrent Abigail M.,
Alston Julian M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
american journal of agricultural economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.949
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1467-8276
pISSN - 0002-9092
DOI - 10.1093/ajae/aar138
Subject(s) - subsidy , calorie , economics , commodity , consumption (sociology) , deadweight loss , welfare , obesity , agricultural economics , agriculture , yield (engineering) , public economics , market economy , medicine , social science , ecology , materials science , sociology , metallurgy , biology , endocrinology
Many commentators claim that farm subsidies have contributed significantly to the “obesity epidemic” by making fattening foods relatively cheap and abundant and, symmetrically, that taxing “unhealthy” commodities or subsidizing “healthy” commodities would contribute to reducing obesity rates. In this article we use an equilibrium displacement model to estimate and compare the economic welfare effects from a range of hypothetical farm commodity and retail food policies as alternative mechanisms for encouraging consumption of healthy food or discouraging consumption of unhealthy food, or both. We find that, compared with retail taxes on fat, sugar, or all food, or subsidies on fruits and vegetables at the farm or retail levels, a tax on calories would be the most efficient obesity policy. A tax on calories would have the lowest deadweight loss per pound of fat reduction in average adult weight, and would yield a net social gain once the impact on public health care expenditures is considered.