Premium
Impacts of Minimum Quality Standards Imposed Through Marketing Orders or Related Producer Organizations
Author(s) -
Saitone Tina L.,
Sexton Richard J.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american journal of agricultural economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.949
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1467-8276
pISSN - 0002-9092
DOI - 10.1093/ajae/aap005
Subject(s) - profit (economics) , quality (philosophy) , business , product (mathematics) , order (exchange) , welfare , industrial organization , deadweight loss , marketing , economics , microeconomics , market economy , finance , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , epistemology
We analyze the impacts of minimum quality standards (MQS) imposed by producers acting collectively through a producer organization, such as a marketing order. MQS imposed in a competitive market can never enhance social welfare because in general an MQS creates two deadweight losses—one due to inefficient enhancement of product quality and a second due to wastage of the low‐quality product. Any MQS that a competitive industry implements based upon a profit criterion causes all consumers in the market to be harmed. However, an MQS may be preferred relative to supply control as a second‐best instrument for transferring income to producers.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom