z-logo
Premium
Explaining the Impact of USDA's Healthy Incentives Pilot on Different Spending Outcomes
Author(s) -
Wilde Parke,
Klerman Jacob Alex,
Olsho Lauren E.W.,
Bartlett Susan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
applied economic perspectives and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.4
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 2040-5804
pISSN - 2040-5790
DOI - 10.1093/aepp/ppv028
Subject(s) - incentive , supplemental nutrition assistance program , incentive program , business , economics , demographic economics , public economics , agriculture , food insecurity , microeconomics , food security , ecology , biology
This article reports spending results for the USDA's Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP), which tested a 30% incentive on fruit and vegetable purchases with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Self‐reported mean usual monthly spending for all fruits and vegetables was $6.15 higher for randomly assigned HIP participant households than for a control group. Much of the additional spending appears to have taken place in ways that did not earn the incentive—spending with non‐SNAP resources or in retailers that did not participate in HIP. This article investigates mechanisms that might explain the HIP impact on fruit and vegetable purchases that did not earn the incentive.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here