z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
We need to address ableism in science
Author(s) -
Raven J Peterson
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
molecular biology of the cell
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.463
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1939-4586
pISSN - 1059-1524
DOI - 10.1091/mbc.e20-09-0616
Subject(s) - ableism , workforce , prejudice (legal term) , inclusion (mineral) , disability discrimination , field (mathematics) , population , disabled people , disability studies , inclusion–exclusion principle , engineering ethics , public relations , sociology , psychology , social psychology , social science , gender studies , political science , law , mathematics , applied psychology , engineering , life style , demography , politics , pure mathematics
In science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, disabled people remain a significantly underrepresented part of the workforce. Recent data suggests that about 20% of undergraduates in the United States have disabilities, but representation in STEM fields is consistently lower than in the general population. Of those earning STEM degrees, only about 10% of undergraduates, 6% of graduate students, and 2% of doctoral students identify as disabled. This suggests that STEM fields have difficulty recruiting and retaining disabled students, which ultimately hurts the field, because disabled scientists bring unique problem-solving perspectives and input. This essay briefly explores the ways in which ableism-prejudice against disabled people based on the assumption that they are "less than" their nondisabled peers-in research contributes to the exclusion of disabled scientists and suggests ways in which the scientific community can improve accessibility and promote the inclusion of disabled scientists in academic science.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here