Open AccessSeeing the Value of Video: A Qualitative Study on Patient Preference for Using Video in a Veteran Affairs Telemental Health Program Evaluation
Author(s) -
Patricia V. Chen,
Ashley Helm,
Terri L. Fletcher,
Miryam Wassef,
Julianna Hogan,
Amy Amspoker,
Marylène Cloître,
Jan A. Lindsay
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
telemedicine reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2692-4366
DOI - 10.1089/tmr.2021.0005
Subject(s) - telehealth , telemedicine , videoconferencing , mental health , preference , phone , psychology , qualitative research , online video , medicine , qualitative property , health care , nursing , applied psychology , psychiatry , multimedia , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , social science , machine learning , sociology , economics , microeconomics , economic growth
Background: As the use of telemental health-mental health care delivered through video or phone-has increased in the era of COVID, it is important to understand patients' preferences and perspectives regarding the use of video for telehealth visits. A new web-based treatment program for veterans uses video visits with mental health experts to supplement its online cognitive behavioral therapy to treat clinically significant symptoms of depression and/or post-traumatic stress disorder. Objective: As part of the program evaluation, Veterans were asked, "How important was it for you to be able to physically see your provider through video telehealth?" to understand whether they thought using video was important and why it may or may not be important. Materials and Methods: The study uses data from the program's exit survey and exit interview. The surveys and interviews were conducted over a 19-month period. Surveys and interviews were conducted over the phone with note taking. Matrix and content analyses were used to analyze the qualitative data-predetermined themes and emergent themes were analyzed and inform findings. Results: Seventy-three veterans completed a survey. Of these, 64 completed an interview. The majority of veterans surveyed (75%) said that it was "very important" to physically see their provider through video telehealth, 23% said that it was at least "somewhat important" or "not at all important." This study highlights three main themes found in the qualitative data: patients discuss (1) advantages of using video, (2) why they dislike video, and (3) technological barriers to using video. Conclusions: Being able to visually see a provider, and be seen by a provider, has distinct benefits for care and relationship building that are difficult to achieve over the phone. This has important implications for the future delivery of telemental health care and deserves consideration as patients and providers decide whether to use phone or video for remotely delivered care.