Open AccessDifferential Behavior of Auricular and Articular Chondrocytes in Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels
Author(s) -
Chin-Wan Chung,
Isaac E. Erickson,
Robert L. Mauck,
Jason A. Burdick
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
tissue engineering. part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.964
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1937-335X
pISSN - 1937-3341
DOI - 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0291
Subject(s) - hyaluronic acid , self healing hydrogels , chemistry , extracellular matrix , glycosaminoglycan , aggrecan , type ii collagen , tissue engineering , chondrocyte , biophysics , swelling , biomedical engineering , cartilage , in vivo , in vitro , microbiology and biotechnology , articular cartilage , materials science , anatomy , biochemistry , polymer chemistry , osteoarthritis , pathology , composite material , biology , medicine , alternative medicine
Chondrocytes isolated from a variety of sources, including auricular (AU) and articular (AR) cartilage, can differ in cell behavior, growth, and extracellular matrix (ECM) production, which can impact neocartilage properties in tissue engineering approaches. This behavior is also affected by the surrounding microenvironment, including soluble factors, biomaterials, and mechanical loading. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in juvenile AU and AR chondrocyte behavior when encapsulated in radically polymerized hyaluronic acid hydrogels. When implanted in vivo, differences in macroscopic appearance, mechanical properties, glycosaminoglycan content, and collagen content were observed depending on the chondrocyte type encapsulated. Specifically, AU constructs exhibited construct growth and neocartilage formation with increases in aggregate modulus and ECM accumulation with culture, whereas AR constructs retained their construct size and remained translucent with only a minimal increase in the compressive modulus. When cultured in vitro, both cell types remained viable and differences in gene expression were observed for type I and II collagens. Likewise, differences in gene expression were noted after dynamic mechanical loading, where stimulated AR constructs exhibited 2.3- and 1.5-fold increases in type II collagen and aggrecan over free-swelling controls, while AU samples exhibited smaller fold increases of 1.4- and 1.3-fold, respectively. Thus, these data indicate that the specific cell source, cell/material interactions, and loading environment are important in the final properties of tissue-engineered products.