z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Safety and Tolerability of an Eye Drop Based on 0.6% Povidone–Iodine Nanoemulsion in Dry Eye Patients
Author(s) -
Giovanni William Oliverio,
Rosaria Spinella,
Elisa Imelde Postorino,
Leandro Inferrera,
Emanuela Aragona,
Pasquale Aragona
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.727
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1557-7732
pISSN - 1080-7683
DOI - 10.1089/jop.2020.0085
Subject(s) - medicine , tolerability , ophthalmology , meibomian gland , artificial tears , adverse effect , sodium hyaluronate , intraocular pressure , surgery , eyelid
Purpose: To evaluate safety and tolerability on the ocular surface of an anti-septic formulation containing 0.6% povidone-iodine (0.6% PVI) for a 4 week period. Methods: An observational, prospective study included 20 mild-moderate dry eye disease (DED) patients who enrolled at the Ocular Surface Disease Unit of the University of Messina, receiving 0.6% PVI eye drops for 28 days, 2 drops twice daily (BID). The assessment included the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire; symptoms score (0 = absent to 3 = severe) for burning, ocular dryness, foreign body sensation, watery eyes, tearing, photophobia, and ocular pain; fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT); and corneal-conjunctival staining, performed at baseline (T0), after 7 (T7) and 28 (T28). Schirmer I -test, corneal endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, and fundus examination were performed at T0 and T28. The main outcome measures were TBUT and corneal-conjunctival staining as markers of ocular surface homeostasis. For statistical analysis, Student's T -test and Wilcoxon test were used as appropriate. Results: No significant alterations of the safety parameters were found throughout the study. Further, at T28 a significant improvement of burning, ocular dryness, foreign body sensation, and watery eyes (T0 vs. T28 P  < 0.03) were observed; corneal-conjunctival staining improved at T28 (T0 vs. T28 P  < 0.0001), and TBUT improved already at T7 (T0 vs. T7 P  = 0.0008) lasting so till the end of the study. The only adverse event was mild burning at instillation for the first 3 days of treatment in most of the patients. Conclusions: The treatment with 0.6% PVI was safe and well tolerated in a group of patients with a damaged ocular surface.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom