z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Impact of Antipsychotic Guidelines on Laboratory Monitoring in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Author(s) -
Imaan Kara,
Melanie Penner
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.935
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1557-8992
pISSN - 1044-5463
DOI - 10.1089/cap.2020.0096
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , pediatrics , antipsychotic , retrospective cohort study , therapeutic drug monitoring , emergency medicine , psychiatry , schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , drug , pathology
Objectives: The Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics in Children (CAMESA) guidelines provide monitoring recommendations for children who are treated with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the CAMESA guidelines on SGA monitoring in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Methods: A retrospective chart review compared laboratory monitoring in children treated with SGAs who were referred to a tertiary psychopharmacology clinic before (2008-2011) and after (2013-2016) CAMESA publication. Chi-squared tests were used to detect changes in SGA use and monitoring between the two time periods. Results: A total of 345 charts were reviewed ( n  = 136 pre-CAMESA, n  = 209 post-CAMESA). The proportion of children taking an SGA increased significantly (35% vs. 49%; p  = 0.02) as did the duration of SGA treatment before tertiary assessment (18.6 months vs. 27.2 months; p  = 0.03). SGA monitoring data were missing in 40% of charts pre-CAMESA and in 31% of charts post-CAMESA. The proportion of patients with any available laboratory monitoring did not change between the time periods (35% pre-CAMESA vs. 39% post-CAMESA; p  = 0.56). Similarly, the proportion of patients with full laboratory monitoring was not significantly different between time periods (15% pre-CAMESA vs. 25% post-CAMESA; p  = 0.23). Conclusions: SGA monitoring rates did not significantly improve after CAMESA guideline publication. To maximize benefit and mitigate risks of these medications, there is a need to identify barriers to SGA monitoring.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here