z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Examination of Polypharmacy Trajectories Among HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Men in an Ongoing Longitudinal Cohort from 2004 to 2016
Author(s) -
Deanna Ware,
Frank J. Palella,
Kara W. Chew,
M. Reuel Friedman,
Gypsyamber D’Souza,
Ken Ho,
Michael Plankey
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
aids patient care and stds
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.504
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1557-7449
pISSN - 1087-2914
DOI - 10.1089/apc.2019.0057
Subject(s) - polypharmacy , medicine , cohort , context (archaeology) , cohort study , psychiatry , gerontology , demography , paleontology , sociology , biology
Polypharmacy is the concurrent use of five or more medications. We used group-based trajectory analysis to identify groups of non-HIV medication polypharmacy and investigate associated risk factors among HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) from 2004 to 2016. Each participant was assigned to mutually exclusive groups based on their observed patterns of polypharmacy over time. Risk factors associated with membership with resulting groups were investigated using a multinomial generalized logit model with repeated measures. There were 3160 participants (54.3% HIV positive) included in the study. The overall prevalence of polypharmacy was 33.1% and was higher in HIV-positive than HIV-negative participants (36.2% vs. 30.0%; p  < 0.001). Four distinct groups of polypharmacy emerged over time among all participants and among HIV-positive participants only: (1) nonpolypharmacy, (2) slow increasing polypharmacy, (3) rapid increasing polypharmacy, and (4) sustained polypharmacy. Being HIV positive, being 50 years of age or older, having medication insurance coverage, and having increased health care use were positively associated with membership in groups with sustained or increasing polypharmacy. Half of participants in each analysis had membership in one of the three high polypharmacy groups. This study revealed that access to care, through medication insurance coverage and health care use, was a key driver of polypharmacy in this cohort. Further exploration of medically appropriate and inappropriate prescribing practices in the context of polypharmacy and its impact on health outcomes in this and other populations is warranted.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here