Open AccessThe Attitude of Medical Students Toward Complementary Medicine: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study
Author(s) -
Gabriele Rotter,
Lea Jerzynski,
Maximilian Hinse,
Sylvia Binting,
Benno Brinkhaus
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the journal of alternative and complementary medicine/journal of alternative and complementary medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.55
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1557-7708
pISSN - 1075-5535
DOI - 10.1089/acm.2021.0181
Subject(s) - medicine , cross sectional study , positive attitude , family medicine , medical education , psychology , social psychology , pathology
Introduction: Complementary medicine (CM) is often used by patients and offered by physicians. The attitude of medical students toward CM in Germany has been given little research attention. The aim was to assess the attitude of medical students toward CM in general and their opinion about the importance of CM university research and teaching. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional study among medical students at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin was performed at the beginning of the summer term 2019 using an online survey. The attitude toward CM was assessed by the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ, range 10-70, neutral at 40; a higher score indicates a more positive attitude toward CM). Furthermore, students rated their own CM use and the perceived importance of CM university research and teaching (range 1-7; a higher score indicates more agreement). The study was approved by the Charité Ethics Committee (institutional review board). Results: Out of 1256 contacted students, 349 (27.8%) students (mean age 23.7 ± 4.3 years, 69.0% female) participated. The attitude toward CM based on the CHBQ was rather neutral (mean 44.2 ± 10.7) and more positive among females than males (mean 46.1 ± 10.7 vs. 40.6 ± 9.5, p < 0.001). Medical students favored CM university research (mean 5.4 ± 1.5) and mostly did not agree that CM is currently taught sufficiently at the university (mean 3.4 ± 1.7). The lifetime prevalence of student's own CM use was 48.4% of respondents (79.1% females). Conclusion: Although medical students, in this sample with a high percentage of females, reported a rather neutral attitude toward CM, the authors' findings indicate that medical students promoted research and teaching in CM. Further multicenter cross-sectional studies in German and European medical universities should be undertaken to explore students' attitudes and wishes regarding the integration of CM in university teaching, research, and patient care.