z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
German pig farmers’ perceived agency under different nitrogen policies
Author(s) -
Luisa Stuhr,
Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,
Melanie JaegerErben,
Felicitas Beier,
Claudia Hunecke,
Quitterie Collig,
Hermann LotzeCampen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
environmental research communications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2515-7620
DOI - 10.1088/2515-7620/ac18a6
Subject(s) - agency (philosophy) , german , agriculture , sustainability , government (linguistics) , business , perception , feeling , sustainable agriculture , public economics , reactive nitrogen , marketing , pig farming , public relations , political science , economics , psychology , social psychology , sociology , geography , nitrogen , social science , philosophy , ecology , linguistics , archaeology , biology , quantum mechanics , zoology , physics , neuroscience , animal production
Agricultural nitrogen (N) emissions represent the most substantial N source in Germany. Even though multiple policies have been introduced at the EU and German national level to reduce agriculturally sourced reactive Nitrogen (N), Germany is exceeding the target of the government’s national sustainability strategy to limit N surpluses. To form a better view of the current N policy challenges, this paper seeks to identify what constrains family-managed pig farmers in Germany from adopting N-reduced farming practices. Our study applies a practice-based approach and reconstructs farmers’ practice and individual perception of the possible capability to change practices ( perceived agency ) through problem-centred interviews. The study identifies different ideal types of farmers based on their reported farming practices and perceived agency : The first type feeling overburdened and weary of the current requirements, the second type acting based on routine and incremental improvement efforts, and the third type adapting early and inventing. However, regarding the perceived agency to adopt N-reduced farming practices our results show that all three farmer types report only low to little agency. Based on the findings, the study identifies type-specific and type-spanning constraining factors. To resolve farmers’ perceived contradictions and inconsistencies which result in the unwillingness to accept further N reduction measures, we argue that policies need to address these factors. To enhance long-term paths for sustainable N-reduced farming practices, this study concludes that N policies need to shift towards outcome-oriented policies to create a collective and holistic understanding of the desired outcome while considering their embeddedness into regional and individual contexts.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here