z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Gauge invariant resolution of the A⃗ · p⃗ versus r⃗ · E⃗ controversy
Author(s) -
Hsiang Shun Chou
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of physics communications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.407
H-Index - 17
ISSN - 2399-6528
DOI - 10.1088/2399-6528/ab5432
Subject(s) - hamiltonian (control theory) , amplitude , algorithm , physics , invariant (physics) , mathematical physics , computer science , quantum mechanics , mathematics , mathematical optimization
We delve into the problem of the choice of the interaction Hamiltonian in quantum transitions by using the gauge invariant formalism. We demonstrate that the gauge invariant transition amplitudes for the bare-bare transitions, which is the case in the majority of experiments, are identical to the conventional results with the velocity form interaction Hamiltonian. Under the electric dipole approximation, the gauge invariant formalism derives the modified length form interaction Hamiltonian in any gauge. We propose a simple experiment that one can perform to verify our prediction. On the other hand, the gauge invariant transition amplitudes for the dressed-dressed transitions, which is the case in the Lamb shift experiment, are identical to the conventional results with the length form interaction Hamiltonian. There is no preferred gauge in the calculations of transition amplitudes. The present investigation resolves the long-standing A ⃗ · p ⃗ versus r ⃗ · E ⃗ controversy and clarifies the prevailing misconception in the literature.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom