
About actual contradiction in geotechnical design and optimal way of it resolution
Author(s) -
A. N. Alekhin,
Alexey Alekhin,
В. Н. Алехин
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/972/1/012015
Subject(s) - contradiction , nonlinear system , quarter (canadian coin) , geotechnical engineering , prime (order theory) , deformation (meteorology) , civil engineering , engineering , geology , computer science , mathematics , epistemology , archaeology , philosophy , history , physics , quantum mechanics , combinatorics , oceanography
The paper describes serious and fundamental contradiction in geotechnical design, which manifested itself to the greatest extent when designing the foundations of high-rise buildings in the third quarter of the 20th century has begun to form from the late of the 19th century to the 20 th years of the 20th century. Prime cause of this contradiction is in complex physical structure of soils, complex nature of their formation and, therefore, in complex form of their deformation. The article also notes the high technical and economic efficiency of using realistic physically nonlinear soil models in the design of geotechnical parts of buildings and structures. In this case such a designing is most effective when using the parameters of nonlinear models determined from data of in-situ tests.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom