Open AccessImproving calculating theory of multiple-cavity reinforced concrete floor panels
Author(s) -
A. S. Vasilyev,
E. A. Plehanova,
Xiaolong Bai
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/962/2/022043
Subject(s) - slab , centroid , deflection (physics) , structural engineering , cracking , beam (structure) , nonlinear system , limit (mathematics) , ultimate load , compatibility (geochemistry) , mathematics , geometry , geology , physics , mathematical analysis , materials science , engineering , finite element method , classical mechanics , geochemistry , quantum mechanics , composite material
It is a known fact that core slabs are introduced as I-shaped beams (T-beams) to simplify calculations and are considered according to the beam theory. However, such a view may cause erroneous calculation results. This is particularly evident when calculating the second group of limit states. The aim of this survey is to examine the influence of the cross current representation of core slabs for samples of various length by defining the impact of these factors (the shape of the cross-section and length) on the bearing and nonrigid capacity as well as a cracking load. The paper makes the calculating theory of reinforced concrete framing clear, in particular, core slabs according to the limit states. The author dwells upon samples of slabs of various lengths with a natural cross-sectional shape in comparison with I-shaped samples of similar length. The author should emphasize that it is assumed both in analytical calculations and in software based on FE analysis in order to save time and computing resources. The author performs a computational investigation of core slabs in a nonlinear setting with forming a plastic centroid in the middle of a slab in the study. It is found out that the slab length affects the calculation results of the considered shapes. The shorter the length, the clearer cut the deviation in the load deflection plots.