Open AccessMapping & Analyzing Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorations with Product Composition
Author(s) -
Savita Ranba Sonwane,
M Ramachandran
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/810/1/012058
Subject(s) - flexural strength , materials science , compressive strength , composite material , dental composite , composite number , dentistry , medicine
This study compares the compressive strength, flexural strength and micro-hardness of three types of dental composite materials {Nano-filled, Nano-hybrid, Micro-hybrid} by respective filler fraction-composition. SEM, EDS technique is used for analysis of obtained results. These days, dental restorations play a very vital role considering the dental health. Esthetically, reliably composite resins are much more superior to ancient tooth filling materials. Hence it is necessity of today’s research is to study and map the mechanical properties of different brands of composite resins and hence provide fruitful results to doctors utilizing these dental composites for satisfactory results. By this, research will be beneficiary to the society. The findings of this study indicates that for Compressive strength, Brilliant NG < Tetric N Ceram < Polofil NHT <Z 350 < Charisma. Flexural Strength, Brilliant NG < Tetric N Ceram < Charisma < Z 350 < Polofil NHT. Micro- hardness, Charisma < Tetric N Ceram < < Z 350 < Brilliant NG < Polofil NHT. In other words, Micro-hybrid- Have highest compressive strength than Nano-filled and Nano-hybrid. Nano- Hybrid- Highest flexural strength & micro-hardness than Nano-filled and Micro-hybrid.