z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of road inequality values using roughometer III and roadroid applications
Author(s) -
Medis Surbakti,
Puja Ginting
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/801/1/012026
Subject(s) - international roughness index , index (typography) , measure (data warehouse) , linear correlation , statistics , correlation , mathematics , transport engineering , value (mathematics) , computer science , environmental science , surface finish , engineering , data mining , geometry , mechanical engineering , world wide web
Roads are essential in the development of an area, where driving safety and comfort are a measure of road construction. We can check road construction by getting an IRI value on a road segment. IRI (International Roughness Index) is the roughness index that most commonly obtained from measured longitudinal road profiles. Roughometer III and Roadroid applications are the tolls to collect IRI data. Roughometer III has more precision than Roadroid, but the Roughometer III is more expensive and more complex than Roadroid. This study tries to make a comparison of IRI values and their correlation between the Roughometer III and Roadroid. The results show that the comparison of IRI Roughometer III values and Roadroid Applications is slightly different. The linear correlation analysis of IRI values on Roughometer III and eIRI values on Roadroid is IRI = 0.8999eIRI + 0.5786 with a correlation level of = 0.8391.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here