Open AccessComparing method equivalence class partitioning and boundary value analysis with study case add medicine module
Author(s) -
I G S Aryandana,
Adhistya Erna Permanasari,
Teguh Bharata Adji
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/732/1/012072
Subject(s) - computer science , equivalence (formal languages) , benchmark (surveying) , white box testing , software , upper and lower bounds , code coverage , class (philosophy) , data mining , software system , programming language , mathematics , software construction , mathematical analysis , geodesy , discrete mathematics , artificial intelligence , geography
Software Testing is helpful to alleviate the developers’ task in improving the system. But in doing software testing, there are problems faced by developers, including information that become a benchmark in the feasibility of software testing. Many factors are used to obtain information or benchmarks. These factors can include line code, program structure, business processes and the time used in conducting trials. A test case is needed to ensure one of the two testing processes. The first is to make sure the data type of the entered data. The method of this process is called Equivalence Class Partitioning (ECP). The second is ensuring the lower bound value, the middle bound value, and the upper limit value of the number of strings as inputs of a system module. The method of this process is called Boundary Value Analysis (BVA). The purpose of this study is to compare the ECP and BVA methods. The expected result of this study is to find out the best method between ECP or BVA. Comparison of calculations using standard matrix testing. This study uses 5 parameters as benchmarks. Based on this study, the ECP method is superior to BVA with 5 parameters used as benchmarks.