z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The comparison between influence of reducer and inner pipe diameter to the pressure and velocity of gold slurry using 3D solid work simulation
Author(s) -
Dikky Antonius,
Kimar Turnip,
Priyono Atmadi,
Romeo Nawiko
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/725/1/012003
Subject(s) - reducer , slurry , materials science , work (physics) , pipe flow , mechanics , composite material , mechanical engineering , engineering , turbulence , physics
Gold mining Pipe with slurry was modified to observe its effect in pressure-discharge pipe. The fluid was transport using centrifugal pump, while the model simulated using solid work 2018 edition. Three models used in this case were: 28-inch pipe without reducer-pipe; 30-inch pipe without reducer pipe, and 28-inch pipe with reducer-pipe. Each model will produce the discharge pressure, slurry velocity, and the friction. The result shows that the 30-inch pipe without reducer will increase the pressure on the discharge pipe. However, the pressure is not as homogenous as 28 inch-pipe without reducers. 10 % of slurry produced less pressure because the friction occurred in the wall caused by the diameter difference. Meanwhile, the models in 28-inch pipe with reducer-pipe clearly show significant improvement of discharge-pipe pressure. However, the pressure is variety from the centre to the edge of the pipe, with the highest pressure located in the centre of pipe.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here