z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of direct SPT method for calculating axial capacity of piles in Jakarta Area
Author(s) -
S Henrina,
Erly Bahsan,
Tommy Ilyas
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/673/1/012027
Subject(s) - standard penetration test , penetration test , mathematics , structural engineering , load testing , geotechnical engineering , penetration (warfare) , statistics , engineering , operations research , joint (building) , liquefaction
Estimating axial capacity of piles using Direct Method are still considered as challenges these days. Estimation mainly achieved after construction is done and field method such as static load test or PDA are used for calculating axial capacity of piles in real field cosnditions. This paper discussed estimation from 8 building project cases from Jakarta and Depok that have complete standard penetration test data and field calculations ( static load test & PDA ). The main objectives are to observe and correlate the results between every Direct Methods and field methods and to obtain which Direct Method is the most efficient to use for estimating axial capacity of piles in Jakarta area. Direct Methods that are used are Meyerhoff, Shariatmadari, Decourt, Aoki, and Robert. Calculation results showed that the most efficient standard penetration test method is that proposed by Decourt with average result of comparison between estimated axial capacity of piles and field calculation is roughly 1.03. The most underpredicted between every standard penetration test method is the one proposed by Aoki de Alencar with roughly 92% underprediction ratios and the largest overpredicted method is proposed by Shariatmadari with roughly ratios of 56%.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here