Drying Shrinkage Deformation Comparison Between Foam Concrete, Geopolymer Concrete, Disintegrated, and Non-disintegrated Cement Mortar

Foamed concrete has been known as a building material for nearly 100 years. In the beginning, it was used as an insulation material with very low density. Since then there have been attempts to make this material more load-bearing and structural. In present-day foamed concrete is being used in soil reinforcement, building blocks and in other sorts of building applications [1]. Another innovative material - the geopolymer concrete has been around only for 40 years. It is being used in buildings and infrastructures objects such as railroads, reservoirs, and houses and others. The main benefit of the geopolymer is that it is green material that is partially made by utilizing waste products. The geopolymer manufacturing carbon footprint is 2 times less than the Portland cement carbon footprint. Another way to reduce Portland cement carbon footprint is to reuse old cement. In the past few decades, there has been a considerable amount of researches regarding the partial replacement of cement using disintegrated cement in cement mortar or concrete. As it is known to obtain powder mineral filler material planetary ball milling is applied, but it is ineffective. It has been discovered that grinding by collision is a more effective method for refining brittle material. One of the ways to refine is to disintegrate with disintegrator. This raises the question of whether old cement disintegration together with sand can improve its long-term properties and what differences do these different cement and alkaline activated compounds have. The aim of this article is to determine the difference of shrinkage deformation for foamed concrete and disintegrated cement mortar which is Portland cement based cement composites and geopolymer concrete which represents alkali-activated cement composites. The size of all shrinkage specimens was 46mm in the diameter and 190mm in height. The shrinkage deformations of the specimen were determined by consistently measuring specimen deformation displacement. Shrinkage deformation values for foamed concrete in the 81st day did reach 11.85mm *10 −2 , disintegrated old cement mortar 4.88mm *10 −2 , non-disintegrated new cement mortar 5.02mm *10 −2 , non-disintegrated old cement mortar 4.33mm *10 −2 , but for geopolymer concrete, on the 81st day, it was 3.73mm *10 −2 .