Open AccessKinetics Modelling of Batch Anaerobic Co-digestion of Domestic Primary Sewage Sludge and Food Waste in a Stirred Reactor
Author(s) -
Siti Mariam Sulaiman,
Roslinda Seswoya
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/601/1/012012
Subject(s) - food waste , anaerobic digestion , sewage sludge , waste management , methane , pulp and paper industry , biogas , environmental science , sewage treatment , sewage , chemistry , waste treatment , engineering , organic chemistry
Anaerobic digestion was conventionally applied for treating sewage sludge. However, the accumulation of solid waste particularly food waste has reach the critical levels worldwide. In practice, the food waste was dumped into the landfill for ultimate disposal. However, the greenhouse gases produced in the landfill makes this is no longer a preferable option. Anaerobic digestion was seen as an alternative for managing the food waste in a sustainable way. Methane, a renewable energy is potentially in replacing fossil fuel. However, the methane yield from the digestion of food waste inefficient. Therefore, a study of the co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste was conducted to investigate the improvement of the methane yield. This study was conducted by using a mixture of domestic primary sewage sludge and food waste as a co-substrate for the anaerobic digester. The kinetics modified Gompertz modelling was applied to describe the anaerobic digestion process. A series of batch biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay was prepared using Automatic Methane Potential Test System (AMPTS II) to investigate the anaerobic digestibility of the mixture of domestic primary sewage sludge and food waste. The BMP assay showed that the co-digestion improved the ultimate methane yield by 32.6% higher than domestic primary sewage sludge alone, indicated that the co-substrate characteristics influencing the methane yield. Besides that, the greater VS/TS ratio of the substrate also resulted in the greater methane yield. The kinetics parameter from the modelling analysis were slightly lower as compared to the laboratory data.