Open AccessPeer review declaration
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/1159/1/011002
Subject(s) - presentation (obstetrics) , declaration , consistency (knowledge bases) , publishing , library science , scope (computer science) , computer science , medical education , psychology , operations research , medicine , political science , mathematics , law , surgery , artificial intelligence , programming language
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind peer review • Review criteria: Consistency with the conference scope; Academic value of the paper; Presentation style of the content. Each criterion was assessed with the following scale: Poor, Satisfactory, Good, Excellent. The majority rule was applied to determine the outcome of the review. If all the referees give different marks for a single position, that the intermediate mark used as a consensus. All the manuscripts with Good and Excellent marks on each position were accepted as is. The manuscripts with Poor marks on any position were declined. Other manuscripts were sent to the authors for revision. After revision, an editor performed a check if the revision was successful. If necessary, the editor could submit the updated manuscript to the reviewers to get their confirmation of revision. • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via e-mail • Number of submissions received: 190 • Number of submissions sent for review: 139 • Number of submissions accepted: 109 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 30 • Any additional info on review process: three independent referees one of which invited from outside the conference committee reviewed all the papers. The review process was held under the supervision of the organizing commitee. • Contact person for queries: Aleksey Solntsev, chairman of the organizing comittee, professor, dean of the faculty of Automotive Vehicles, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University (MADI), Moscow, Russia, solntsev@madi.ru