
Different infill geometry influence on mechanical properties of FDM produced PLA
Author(s) -
Lorenzo Bergonzi,
M. Vettori,
L. Stefanini,
L. D’Alcamo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
iop conference series. materials science and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1757-899X
pISSN - 1757-8981
DOI - 10.1088/1757-899x/1038/1/012071
Subject(s) - infill , structural engineering , slicing , ultimate tensile strength , materials science , software , composite material , engineering , mechanical engineering , computer science , programming language
Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) is one of the most widespread additive manufacturing technologies due to its relatively low cost and simplicity. Usually, printed parts have an internal structure (infill) that is not produced with 100% material density. This strategy is adopted to save material and time thanks also to the fact that when a component is loaded, stress are concentrated on its skin rather than in the internal section. Furthermore, infill structure can have different densities and topology. Slicer software have various configurations that can be exploited to produce internal structures: according to All3DP [1], some are intended for functional parts while others are more indicated to prototypes only. Aim of this work, is to compare the effect of different infill topologies produced using Ultimaker CURA [2] slicing software on material mechanical properties. Preliminary experimental activity has been carried out in order to determine the most suitable printing temperature. MaCh3D, an innovative miniaturized universal testing machine [3] was used to perform uniaxial tensile tests. Results underline the difference between different kind of infill in term of mechanical properties, given the same infill density across all specimens. Additionally, in order to evaluate infill percentage effect on mechanical properties, some of the most performing infill from the characterisation activity have been selected and specimens produced with 20%, 50%, 80% infill percentage. In the end, both infill topology as well as density impacts on mechanical properties.