z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison Between Numerical Flow3d Software and Laboratory Data, For Sediment Incipient Motion.
Author(s) -
Rasool. Kosaj,
Rafid Alboresha,
Sadeq Oleiwi Sulaiman
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
iop conference series. earth and environmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1755-1307
pISSN - 1755-1315
DOI - 10.1088/1755-1315/961/1/012031
Subject(s) - flume , geotechnical engineering , geology , sediment , channel (broadcasting) , open channel flow , computational fluid dynamics , hydrology (agriculture) , flow (mathematics) , geomorphology , mechanics , engineering , mathematics , geometry , physics , electrical engineering
In this paper, the laboratory data were compared with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Flow3D for predicting the beginning of sediment incipient motion in rigid boundary channel for two types of sands, irrigation, and sewer types, in rectangular flume (0.5*0.5) m cross-section. Tests were made for soil samples with different diameters, specific weights. The testing was performed in slopes ranging from 0.001-0.003 for irrigation types and 0.0025-0.025 for sewer types depending on the original parameter. The Flow-3D software has simulated the laboratory work using scouring models MPM and Nielsen. the relation between sediment incipient motion velocity, particle size, and channel bed slope was predicted. The results were relatively more than laboratory data for the MPM model, while grating convergence for Nielsen model, especially for small diameter sediment. Also, the laboratory results are more close to the results of Flow3D using the Nielsen model when the value of bed slope of the channel is greater, and vice versa when the slope decreases.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here