Peer review declaration

• Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe): Double Blind a. All papers submitted were checked their similarity index using Turnitin. b. Papers have similarity index more than 25% were rejected. c. After that, the format of the papers was checked. Papers that did not follow the IOP template will be sent back to the authors for revision. d. All papers passed the similarity index and have already follow the IOP template will be sent to the reviewers. e. Reviewers reviewed the papers and give comments to the papers. f. Scientific committee decided if the papers: accepted, accepted with major revision, accepted with minor revision, or rejected. g. Author revised their papers and send back their revision h. After that editor will check again using Turnitin to make sure similarity source not more that 5% for each source in each article i. Editor will check again manual to see similarity index and source to make sure all is good • Conference submission management system: All papers from the conference submitted using our system where each author must register first and send article through email vicest@konferensi.id • Number of submissions received: 256 Submission were received • Number of submissions sent for review: 227 Submission was sent for review, and the rest was rejected because out of scope, low-quality article and high similarity • Number of submissions accepted: 147 Paper accepted based on IOP JPCS Scope and quality • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (147/227) x 100 = 64.7 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Times • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 Reviewer Involved+ 5 Editors, each reviewer received 8-10 papers with 2 weeks review process • Any additional info on review process: NONE • Contact person for queries: Robbi Rahim, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Medan, Indonesia and University Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia Email: robbirahim@ieee.org, Whatsapp+62 8126326393